In Moore’s
article (2011), she claims that the new social media (i.e. Twitter and
Facebook) has caused a global revolution, and threatens the social order. It
has aided the success of various uprisings, as a form of organizing tool and
broadcasting platform, reaching global audiences at a much faster rate than
mainstream media. However, some argue that this digital activism has been an on-going
issue, and not only a recent phenomenon. Furthermore, director of International
Freedom of Expression York argues that it has to be accompanied with offline
action in order to be successful. Nonetheless, as a result of the political
sensitivity revolving around social media, countries such as China, Vietnam and
Burma have imposed strict restrictions on their digital space, as well as
pressurised private companies for data. However, their effectiveness has been
put to the question.
With
the rise of technology and digital usage in the 21st Century, it is indeed true that social
media is able to reach a wide audience with just a click of the finger. This has
made it a very useful tool in attracting global attention and raising awareness
about various issues. Personally, as part of this digital generation, I have
also had first-hand experience such as in the example of the Pink Dot Movement.
Started out on a social media platform Facebook, it had gained the attention of
many youths around Singapore and started a virtual rally, which led to the largest,
record-breaking turn out in its demonstration this year. Furthermore, since its
success a few years ago, it has also inspired people around the world to organise the pink
dot event, such as in Hong Kong, Montreal, New York etc.This shows how the use
of new social media has grown to be powerful platform.
However,
without the accompaniment of an off-line activism, linking individuals and
getting the word out through technology would render useless. From the article,
some argue that the use of new social media merely acts as a catalytic factor.
I agree that this is true for a few reasons as follows.
Firstly,
despite the big hoo-ha over the internet, it is unlikely for governments to
take any demonstration seriously without concrete action. After all, the
internet is merely a virtual platform. It might be able to translate ideas,
however if each individual does not rise up to his or her stand and make a
statement offline, it is difficult to pressurise for changes and these ideas are merely empty talk. Thus, it is
difficult for the new social media alone to create a global revolution.
Secondly,
the use of social media faces a huge challenge – censorship. Due to the power
of the social media and its political sensitivity, some countries have imposed
restrictions on their digital space, which limits the capability of social
media. A valid example, as proven from the article as well, is the “Great
Firewall” of China. The Chinese government has strict control over the
cyberspace and censors any information that threatens their national security.
Although the effectiveness of such measures was questioned, it still shows how
the new social media is not a viable tool to be used alone, as there is no guarentee.
Thirdly,
the use of new social media has its limitations as well, as it is only able to
reach those who are more tech-savvy. In the case of Singapore, although our
nation is developed and generally technologically advanced, the prevalence of
social media lies only in the younger, more tech-savvy population. The older
generation might not trust and rely as much on this new form of media. Thus,
the spread of ideas would only be able to reach a certain group of people,
hindering its effectiveness.
In
conclusion, I agree with the article, and that the prevalence of the new social
media has indeed changed the social construct and caused a “global revolution”.
However, it must be used hand-in-hand with other measures and concrete action
in order to be successful in its uprising attempts.
Reference:
Moore, J. (2011).
Social media: Did Twitter and Facebook really build a global revolution? http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-Issues/2011/0630/Social-media-Did-Twitter-and-Facebook-really-build-a-global-revolution
This response is intelligent and quite detailed, Daine. Your summary seems accurate, and I appreciate your topic focus. Your thesis is clear. I really like it when you personalize this with reference to the Pink Dot Movement.
ReplyDeleteTo improve the essay, you need to take the following into consideration:
1) the need for secondary support for some of your primary claims (for example, what does the Pink Dot Movement do to go beyond the digital arena?)
2) minor problems in the expressions listed here:
-- I have also had first-hand experience such as in the example of the Pink Dot Movement.
-- in its demonstration this year
-- the pink dot event, such as in Hong Kong, Montreal, New York etc.
-- would render useless
-- big hoo-ha
-- and that the prevalence
-- in its uprising attempts.
-- From the article,
3) one run on sentence (hint: How should you use the word 'however'?)
Let's work on this.